That red hits so nicely against the black & white. For around $130, it’s a statement piece. On foot, they feel secure; the lacing system gives good lockdown. Aesthetically, they look even better on-camera? Pro: head-turning design without being overly flashy. Con: like most AJ1s, the midsole is firm—it's an 'acquired' feel. Who's it for? Sneakerheads wanting a classic vibe. Not for you if all-day walkin' comfort is your #1 priority. Just being real! Quick comparison: The Air Jordan Low 1 feels more substantial than some other retro lows. The toe box shape is just "right". My 'Court Purple' pair has clean stitching. It’s not an Ultra-comfort shoe, but for casual wear & style points? It's a home run, especially in this color. So, here's the deal with the "air jordan low 1" 'University Blue.' The materials are pretty standard for the Jordan series, but that color? Stunning in person. It looks even better on foot than in the box. Compared to the Air Jordan 1 Mid, the profile is sleeker. Pros: incredible versatility, a true summer sneaker. Cons: that flat, firm ride isn't for everyone seeking comfort. At ~$130, it's a premium for the heritage. Worth it for the collection? For sure. For pure comfort? Maybe not. Comparing it to other Jordans? The Air Jordan 1 Low is like the easy-going sibling. The AJ1 High is more formal; the AJ4 is chunkier. This Low version strips it back to basics. It's lightweight, low-profile, and focuses purely on that classic silhouette. For me, that's a big advantage for summer or just avoiding a bulky feel. It's a different experience from the rest of the Jordan line, in a good way.

  • Shown: Red Thunder
  • Style: CT8012-116

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5