As for the "air jordan low 1" feel on-foot, it's lightweight and super easy to slip on. The flat, wide laces give it that retro vibe. Compared to a Jordan 1 High, it's obviously less restrictive. The break-in period is real, though - the heel might rub a bit at first. If you want a statement low-top, this is it. Alright, so I just unboxed this classic - the Air Jordan 1 Low in the 'Chicago' colorway. First impression? The quality is solid. The iconic color blocking just "pops". It's the OG silhouette we all know, but in that low-cut form, ya know? Priced around $140-$150 USD, it's a classic look for your rotation without breaking the bank. A staple in the Jordan series for sure. Just copped this "Shadow" Air Jordan Low 1. First thing I noticed? The build is really consistent. That low-cut silhouette is so versatile. Price was about $135 USD. On feet, they feel great – true to size, with a nice locked-in feel around the midfoot. The low profile makes them super easy to pair with jeans or shorts. A major advantage is their comfort for walking. A slight downside? They can feel a bit flat if you're used to super-cushioned sneakers. Personally, I think these are a must-have for any casual rotation. I wouldn't recommend them for running or gym sessions, though – that's not their purpose. For the collectors and casual wearers alike, here's my take. The 'Dark Mocha' "air jordan low 1" is a grail for many. The materials on this specific pair feel a step up—the suede is nice. On-foot, the silhouette is sleek and less imposing than a high-top. It's a pro if you have shorter pants. A potential con is the creasing; the toe box will show wear. But that's part of the charm, right? At its price point, it's a strong offering within the Jordan series for a premium-looking everyday shoe.

  • Shown: Cherry
  • Style: 555088-161

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5