Right out of the box, the leather quality is decent - not premium, but solid for the $130 price point. The silhouette? It's iconic. That low-top profile is just so clean and instantly recognizable as a classic from the Jordan series. First impression is strong for a simple, versatile sneaker. What's up, let's get into this Air Jordan Low 1 "University Blue" pair. Unboxing, the colors really pop – that clean white and blue combo is "chef's kiss". For a low-top, it carries the Jordan 1 legacy perfectly. On foot, they're light and easy to wear. The leather quality here is good for the $125 USD price point. Compared to a Mid, the profile is just a bit sleeker. Big pro is the easy summer styling. A potential con? The break-in period for the heel area can be real for some folks. I'd recommend these if you love clean colorways. Maybe look elsewhere if you need arch support right out the box. Alright, so let's get into this Air Jordan 1 Low, the OG 'Chicago' colorway. First impression? The shape is classic - it's perfect. The build quality on this pair feels solid for a GR, no major glue issues. At $120 USD, you're getting that iconic Jordan series look without breaking the bank. On foot, it's a bit stiff initially, but it breaks in. The main pro? It's a timeless silhouette. The con for some? It's a basic low-top. If you want hype, maybe look elsewhere. If you want a clean, wearable sneaker? This is it. Okay, let's get into these. Right out the box, this colorway is "clean" — a nice, simple white and black 'Black Toe' vibe? Love it. For the price point around $130? The leather feels decent, not premium, but the build on my pair of the "Air Jordan Low 1" is solid. The classic silhouette is just undeniable. If you're new to the Jordan series, this low-top is a perfect, versatile entry point, honestly.

  • Shown: True Blue
  • Style: 555088-062

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5