For me? They're TTS. The toe box has some room—which I prefer—but the overall fit is snug. Break-in time is real, especially around the pinky toe area. After a few wears, they mold nicely. If you have wide feet? Maybe consider half a size up in the air jordan low 1. It's a common thing with Jordan 1s, high or low. Just got these in, the Air Jordan Low 1 ‘Bleached Coral’. Wow, the color is even brighter in hand! Construction feels consistent with the Jordan 1 line—solid. Sliding my foot in, the fit is snug (I went TTS). Walking around, you really notice how low-cut it is—freedom of movement is a plus. Compared to bulkier sneakers, it's a relief. Main pro: killer summer style. Potential issue: bright color isn't for everyone. For $125 USD, it's a fun, statement piece from the Jordan catalog. Best for collectors of colorways; maybe not for your one-and-only sneaker. The design in-hand vs. on-foot is interesting. In photos, some colorways of the "Air Jordan 1 Low" can look basic. But wearing them? The proportions just work. This 'Shadow' grey pair looks super sleek with jeans or shorts. It's a low-key flex. Compared to the bulkier high-top AJ1, this is a way more manageable, summer-ready option. A definite wardrobe staple. Yo, here with the Air Jordan Low 1 'Shadow' edition. Unboxing: the grey and black suede/leather combo is super subtle and premium-feeling. Honestly? They look even better in hand than in pictures. Slipping them on, the fit is secure—no heel slip for me. The beauty of this low-top is its under-the-radar style; it's not as loud as some other Jordan 1 colorways. Pro? Incredibly easy to wear daily. Con? Like all OG-style AJ1s, they lack modern cushioning. If you want a low-key, high-quality staple for your rotation, 100% recommend. For tech-heavy comfort seekers, maybe pass.

  • Shown: Gorge Green
  • Style: CK5666 100

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5