Opening the box, that clean white leather with grey hits just pops. Super fresh for spring/summer. On foot, they're light and the break-in period isn't bad at all. Visually, this might be one of the cleanest low-top Jordan series releases recently. At around $115 USD, it's a fair price. Pro? Incredibly easy to style. Con? White leather means you gotta keep 'em clean. I'd recommend these to anyone wanting a simple, classic sneaker. Maybe not for someone who beats their shoes up daily. For the collectors and casual wearers alike, here's my take. The 'Dark Mocha' "air jordan low 1" is a grail for many. The materials on this specific pair feel a step up—the suede is nice. On-foot, the silhouette is sleek and less imposing than a high-top. It's a pro if you have shorter pants. A potential con is the creasing; the toe box will show wear. But that's part of the charm, right? At its price point, it's a strong offering within the Jordan series for a premium-looking everyday shoe. Comparing it to other Lows in the Jordan series, like the AJ3 or AJ5 Low, the "AJ1 Low" wins on pure simplicity. It's stripped back to the essentials. You're paying for the shape and the history. Some might find that boring, but I think it's why it remains so popular. It’s a design that never "truly" goes out of style. Unboxing these Jordan Lows today, and my first thought was—wow, the shape on these is "really" nice this time. I went with this versatile grey/white color; it’s perfect for "everyday" wear. Slipping them on, the fit is snug – maybe go half a size up if you have wider feet. Compared to a Mid, this "air jordan low 1" just feels sleeker, more streamlined. It’s a simple, timeless shoe. Pro? Endless style options. Con? Don't expect Cloud-like comfort. Ideal for the style-focused sneakerhead.

  • Shown: Denim
  • Style: CT8529-410

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5