Like, really stiff initially. The leather needs to soften up. But let's be honest—we don't buy these for bounce. We buy them for the "legendary" look. They're incredibly photogenic and work with "literally" any fit. Versus a Jordan 1 High, it’s a less-committal, more summer-ready option. Great for casual use, terrible for running errands all day. My advice? Know what you're getting: a style icon, not a comfort king. First thoughts on the Air Jordan Low 1 'University Blue'? The suede is decent—better than some Mids I've seen. That baby blue is so fresh for spring/summer. Sliding my foot in, the insole is pretty basic, but the overall fit is good. Styling these is a breeze; they look great with jeans or shorts. Versus a Jordan 1 High, you lose some of the dramatic look but gain wearability. Pro: fantastic seasonal color. Con: suede can be high-maintenance in bad weather. This is a great shoe for a collector wanting a pop of color or someone building a versatile rotation. Not a workhorse sneaker. Who should skip it? If you prioritize extreme comfort or modern tech in your shoes, look elsewhere. Also, if you want a bold, head-turning design, some of the simpler Air Jordan 1 Low colorways might be too basic for you. It's a foundational piece, not always a statement. For anyone debating between mids and lows, here’s my take. The "Air Jordan Low 1" offers a different vibe — it’s less restrictive, more breathable for warmer days. The silhouette looks great from every angle on camera, too. The 'White Cement Grey' pair I got for $135 is super easy to style. Honestly, if you own a lot of high-tops, adding a low is a smart move for variety.
