The Air Jordan Low 1 is a fashion-first shoe, period. My pair here is the ‘Neutral Grey’. Unboxing, the shape is perfect—a sleek, low-profile version of the iconic OG. Comfort is… fine. It's not uncomfortable, but you feel the court heritage—it's firm. The advantage? This design is incredibly photogenic and looks great on foot. Disadvantage? The price, close to $130 for tech from 1985. If you love the Jordan series history and clean aesthetics, you'll appreciate these. If you prioritize innovative cushioning, look elsewhere. Alright, review time for this Air Jordan 1 Low 'Shadow' version. Unboxing, the black and grey leather combo is a certified classic - less loud than other colorways. On-foot feel is snug and secure, true to size. I love how this Jordan 1 Low looks with jeans or shorts; it's a true wardrobe staple. The main advantage here is versatility. The possible drawback? Some might find the design "too" simple. If you want your first pair of Jordans and need something that goes with everything, this is a perfect start. Hardcore tech seekers, look elsewhere. Let's talk design. This "Black Cement" Air Jordan 1 Low is fire in person. The elephant print on the mudguard adds a nice texture, but overall, it's a super clean shoe. On camera or in real life, that low-cut profile just looks slick. It doesn't scream for attention, but sneakerheads will definitely spot it. A solid 9/10 on aesthetics for this specific release. Now, the potential downside? The break-in period. The leather can be stiff initially, and the flat, narrow fit might not suit wider feet immediately. Also, if you need serious arch support or modern impact protection for all-day wear, this might not be your first pick. It's a classic for a reason, but comfort isn't its "primary" innovation.

  • Shown: Desert Elephant
  • Style: 555088-117

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5