First thing out the box, that classic silhouette is "just" perfect in a low-top form. The leather quality? Honestly, it's decent for the $125 price point – clean, classic, gets the job done. It feels super lightweight in hand, which is always a good sign for a casual wear shoe. A real clean start to this review. Just copped this Air Jordan Low 1 in the 'Starfish' orange. WOW, the color is even better in person—super rich. Construction is standard Jordan 1 fare: good, not exceptional. On foot? They feel secure, but break them in indoors first. The real magic is on-foot; the low cut lets your pants do the talking. Compared to a Dunk Low, the toe box is a bit more refined. Pro: insane color that still feels wearable. Potential con: the bold color isn't for everyone's closet. At this price point, it's a fun splash. Recommend if you love color; maybe skip if your wardrobe is all neutrals. Just put these "air jordan low 1" shoes on, and…yeah, it's a familiar feel. The ankle collar is low, obviously—offering way more mobility than the highs. The cushioning is firm; don't expect Boost-like softness here. It's a "connected-to-the-floor" sensation, which I actually prefer for casual wear. They're "light", too, super easy to just slip on and go about your day. Check out this 'White Cement' Air Jordan 1 Low. Opening the box, that clean white leather with grey hits just pops. Super fresh for spring/summer. On foot, they're light and the break-in period isn't bad at all. Visually, this might be one of the cleanest low-top Jordan series releases recently. At around $115 USD, it's a fair price. Pro? Incredibly easy to style. Con? White leather means you gotta keep 'em clean. I'd recommend these to anyone wanting a simple, classic sneaker. Maybe not for someone who beats their shoes up daily.

  • Shown: Cherry
  • Style: 555088-117

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5