It's the Air Jordan 1 Low in 'University Blue'. That color is just "chef's kiss" in person - so vibrant. The materials are decent, typical of this price point ($120-ish USD). Putting them on, the comfort is about what you expect from an AJ1 Low: not plush, but fine for all-day wear. Compared to modern basketball shoes? Forget performance. This is purely for style. Big pro is the stunning color. The flip side? They'll get dirty fast. I'd say these are for collectors of clean colorways, not for your beater rotation. Check out this 'White Cement' Air Jordan 1 Low. Opening the box, that clean white leather with grey hits just pops. Super fresh for spring/summer. On foot, they're light and the break-in period isn't bad at all. Visually, this might be one of the cleanest low-top Jordan series releases recently. At around $115 USD, it's a fair price. Pro? Incredibly easy to style. Con? White leather means you gotta keep 'em clean. I'd recommend these to anyone wanting a simple, classic sneaker. Maybe not for someone who beats their shoes up daily. Let's talk feel. Walking in the "Air Jordan Low 1", you feel connected to the ground. It's a flat, stable base. The break-in period is minimal, which is a huge plus. The toe box has decent room. Main advantage? Its timeless design & massive colorway selection. Potential downside? For wider feet, it might feel snug. Always try on if you can! Final verdict: The "air jordan low 1" is a classic for a reason. This "Black and White" panda colorway is a grail for minimalists. It's simple, effective, and always in style. Worth the price? For the design and versatility, yes. Just know what you're getting: a firm, supportive shoe with legendary looks. It's perfect for casual wear, not for performance. If that's your vibe, you won't be disappointed.

  • Shown: Lucky Green
  • Style: 555088-402

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5