This 'Smoke Grey' pair feels decent, but it's not premium. That's the trade-off for the ~$110 price tag. The advantage? That low-cut design makes them super easy to slip on and off. They're a "grab and go" kind of sneaker. Just don't compare the leather quality to some of the higher-tier Retro releases—you'll be disappointed. So here's my real talk. Pros? Timeless style, insane versatility, and a relatively accessible price in the Jordan series. The "Air Jordan Low 1" is a wardrobe staple. Cons? That classic feel means a classic, "basic" footbed. Don't expect modern bounce or Zoom Air. If you need arch support or are on your feet all day? Maybe look elsewhere. But for style points? It's a top-tier pick. First impression out of the box? This pair of Air Jordan Low 1 sneakers is built really well. Stitching is on point, no glue stains I can see. On foot, they’re lightweight—way lighter than the Air Jordan 1 High, for sure. The lockdown is good, but the insole is basic. The major pro here is versatility: this low-cut design works with almost any casual fit. The con? That classic AJ1 midsole offers zero real impact protection. So, for all-day walking? Not ideal. But for a clean, stylish shoe to rock… it’s a yes from me. Just copped this Air Jordan Low 1 in the 'Starfish' orange. WOW, the color is even better in person—super rich. Construction is standard Jordan 1 fare: good, not exceptional. On foot? They feel secure, but break them in indoors first. The real magic is on-foot; the low cut lets your pants do the talking. Compared to a Dunk Low, the toe box is a bit more refined. Pro: insane color that still feels wearable. Potential con: the bold color isn't for everyone's closet. At this price point, it's a fun splash. Recommend if you love color; maybe skip if your wardrobe is all neutrals.

  • Shown: Cherry
  • Style: DC9533-001

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5