The ankle collar is low, obviously—offering way more mobility than the highs. The cushioning is firm; don't expect Boost-like softness here. It's a "connected-to-the-floor" sensation, which I actually prefer for casual wear. They're "light", too, super easy to just slip on and go about your day. Now, the not-so-great part? That firm ride I mentioned. If you're used to Boost or React cushioning, the Air Jordan 1 Low will feel flat and stiff – especially for all-day wear. Also, some colorways use less premium materials. It's not a performance shoe, so manage your expectations. It's about style and heritage first. Let's be real: the Air Jordan Low 1 is the everyday version of the icon. This 'Black Toe' pair I'm holding? Fire. The color blocking is legendary. In terms of feel, it's a firm, supportive ride—don't expect cloud-like softness. On camera, the contrast pops so well. It's a timeless design that never looks out of place. Pro: you get that iconic Jordan 1 look without the height. Con: the outsole picks up dust like crazy. For $120, you're buying into history and style. If you value silhouette and heritage over tech, you'll love this air jordan low 1. Pure performance runners, this isn't your shoe. Here's the thing about the Air Jordan Low 1: it's a lifestyle sneaker, period. I got this 'Neutral Grey' pair, and the simplicity is its strength. Clean lines, no fuss. Wearing them feels... normal? In a good way! They're not "comfort" shoes, but they're not uncomfortable either—it's a balanced, classic feel. In photos, this low-top cuts a super sleek silhouette. Pro: goes with literally anything. Con: zero tech or innovation. You're paying for the name and the look. If you're new to Jordans, an air jordan low 1 is a perfect, low-commitment start. Hardcore tech seekers, look away.

  • Shown: Cherry
  • Style: 384664-060

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5