The feel is less restrictive. Versus something like a Jordan 1 Mid, the profile is nearly identical, just... lower. For $130, you're paying for the iconic look in its most versatile form. If you love the Jordan 1 silhouette but want less bulk, the Air Jordan Low 1 is your answer. Not gonna lie, the materials on some Air Jordan 1 Low releases can be hit or miss. This 'Smoke Grey' pair feels decent, but it's not premium. That's the trade-off for the ~$110 price tag. The advantage? That low-cut design makes them super easy to slip on and off. They're a "grab and go" kind of sneaker. Just don't compare the leather quality to some of the higher-tier Retro releases—you'll be disappointed. Checking out the details up close – the toe box perforations, the wings logo – it's all executed well on this "air jordan low 1". The color saturation in this 'Shadow' inspired cw is really nice. Once laced, they feel secure without being restrictive. They're not heavy at all, which I appreciate. Compared to a mid-top, you get more ankle freedom – a pro for some, a con for others. Main advantage is its iconic, versatile look. The potential issue? The leather can crease noticeably. A great pick for sneakerheads who wear their kicks. First impressions of this Air Jordan Low 1 "Electro Orange"? The color-blocking is bold and fun. It's a statement piece within the classic Jordan 1 low framework. Priced at about $135 USD, it's in that sweet spot. Putting them on, the fit is snug – I'd say true to size. They feel substantial but not heavy. The design pops on camera, no doubt. Main pro: You get that iconic Jordan vibe in a low package. Main con: The ankle padding is minimal, which could bother some. My verdict? Perfect for adding a colorful classic to your wardrobe. Not the best if you need a lot of ankle support or padding.

  • Shown: Patent Bred
  • Style: 378037-003

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5