Unboxing it feels special, even with the typical $130 price point construction. On feet, it’s the same fit & feel: snug, break-in required, iconic look. The red just "pops" on foot. Compared to the High version, it’s a more casual, summer-ready option. Pro: you're wearing a piece of history. Con: they're "everywhere"—not unique if that matters to you. Recommendation? A must for collectors & classics lovers. Skip if you want something under-the-radar. Alright, let's get into these! First impression out of the box? Clean. Super clean. This 'White Cement Grey' colorway of the "Air Jordan Low 1" is just a timeless, versatile look. The leather feels decent, the shape is on point—it’s exactly what you expect from a classic Jordan model. For around $120 USD, you're paying for that iconic silhouette and everyday wearability, which I think is pretty fair. A solid start, honestly. Who are these for? Honestly, almost anyone new to sneakers or building a versatile rotation. The "Air Jordan Low 1" is an entry point into the Jordan series that’s less intimidating than the highs. They're for the person who wants that iconic look without the bulk. Not for you if you need maximum cushioning or arch support—these are about style and heritage first, tech second. Fresh out the box, and I'm impressed by the shape—it’s very true to the original. This ‘Royal’ Air Jordan Low 1 has that iconic color pop. Slipping them on, the fit is true-to-size with a secure wrap. Walking in them feels… normal? It's a basic, grounded sensation. The major win is the versatility of the low-top for different pants. The loss is the lack of any modern comfort tech. So, is it worth it? For a style staple from the Jordan lineage, yes. For a performance or all-day comfort shoe, no. It serves a specific, fashion-driven purpose.

  • Shown: Desert Elephant
  • Style: 555088-700

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5