It's perfect for beginners to the Jordan series, or veterans looking for a versatile beater. The 'University Blue' pair I got for $115 USD is just fire for spring fits. However, if you need arch support or plush cushioning for all-day wear, this classic might not be the one for you. It's about the look, first. Okay, first impression of this Air Jordan Low 1 'Shadow'... the grey nubuck is SO nice. It has a premium feel you don't always get. On feet, they're surprisingly lightweight and the ankle collar doesn't bite—big plus. The design is just... effortlessly cool. It's less bulky than a Jordan 1 High, which I prefer for casual fits. Pro: arguably the most versatile colorway ever. Con: like all AJ1s, ventilation is non-existent. Your feet will get warm. At around $120, it's a fair price for a classic. If you want one Low to rule them all? This is it. Not for wide-footers without sizing up. Straight out of the box, the craftsmanship on this pair is impressive – clean stitching, good panel alignment. This "air jordan low 1" in a sail/light bone colorway is a wardrobe staple. On foot, they're surprisingly comfortable for a flat-soled shoe – the collar doesn't dig into my ankle, which is a win. They look even better on foot than in the box, in my opinion. It's a simple, effective design from the Jordan series. Best for casual, daily driving. Not the best if you're on your feet for 8+ hours. Worth it at retail, for sure. Let's talk design. This "Black Cement" Air Jordan 1 Low is fire in person. The elephant print on the mudguard adds a nice texture, but overall, it's a super clean shoe. On camera or in real life, that low-cut profile just looks slick. It doesn't scream for attention, but sneakerheads will definitely spot it. A solid 9/10 on aesthetics for this specific release.

  • Shown: Hyper Royal
  • Style: CT8532-105

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5