It uses a mix of leather and synthetic—it's fine for the cost. On foot, they feel lighter than they look! The ankle padding is sufficient. The design is just "chef's kiss"—it's why the Jordan 1 Mid remains popular. Honestly, the biggest advantage over the High is often availability and price. Not a performance shoe by any means. Perfect for casual wear, not for balling or long-distance walks. Potential con? The tech, or lack thereof. It's a 1985 design, so the cushioning is basic. If you're used to modern, plush sneakers, the firm feel might be a shock. Also, the ankle collar on this Mid cut — while comfortable — offers less lockdown than a High for actual basketball. Know what you're buying: a lifestyle icon, "not" a performance beast. Sliding these air jordan mid 1s on... immediate comfort. The ankle collar is softer & more flexible than a High, which I actually prefer for casual wear. The padded tongue and interior feel plush. They're not ultra-light, but the weight distribution is good. For all-day wear? I think they'll be just fine, honestly. Final verdict? I'm a fan. The Air Jordan Mid 1 isn't trying to be the rarest or most tech-packed shoe. It's a stylish, accessible piece of the Jordan legacy. It has its flaws — mainly in comfort for long stretches — but its strengths in design, versatility, and price are huge. If that sounds like your vibe, you won't be disappointed. Solid cop.
