Terms of the offer
.. If you have a High, you don't "need" a Mid, but it's a different vibe. The "Air Jordan Mid 1" is easier to put on and off, for sure. It’s less of a statement, more of an everyday shoe. I find myself grabbing these for quick errands more often than my Highs. The price difference in the "Jordan series" makes the Mid a fantastic entry point. Just know the materials might be slightly different—sometimes less leather, more synthetic. Still a great shoe for the money. Comparing it to a High? The Air Jordan Mid 1 lacks the iconic high-top collar and that "ultimate" ankle lockdown. For ball, I'd go High. But for style? The Mid is way easier to throw on and go. It sits between the High and the Low, offering a unique profile that's super wearable. A great alternative in the Jordan series. Now, the real talk - potential cons. The cushioning is basic. If you're on your feet all day, this isn't your shoe. The leather quality can vary by colorway; some might feel a bit stiff. Also, as a "mid 1", it doesn't have the exact same cultural cachet as an OG High for some purists. It’s a classic, but know what you're getting: a heritage design, not modern tech. On feet, the look is undeniable. That Mid cut hits a sweet spot for me—it's less bulky than some modern sneakers but still has that Jordan 1 presence. The leather on this pair? It's decent! Not buttery premium, but it's durable & should crease nicely. For the price point (~$135), I'm not complaining. They look sharp on camera, y'know?
- Shown: True Blue
- Style: CT8532-105
