Air jordan mid 1 : Comparing it directly to an Air Jordan 1 High, the Mid obviously gives you less ankle coverage [2e8b5qdr]

For some, that's a plus for mobility and a cleaner look. For pure, classic basketball aesthetic, the High wins. But for daily versatility? The Mid 1 holds its own, no doubt. Final take? I'm really liking this pair. The value is there - you're paying for the design and heritage. It's not the most comfortable shoe in my rotation, but it's one of the most reliable for looks. The Air Jordan Mid 1 just works. For under $140, it's a solid pickup in my book. So, I put the Air Jordan Mid 1 on foot. Initial feel? The ankle collar is "noticeably" lower than a High. The "cushioning" is firm—it's not super plush or "anything". You're getting that classic, "flat" court feel. The break-in period is real; these can be stiff at first. "Honestly", if you want supreme comfort out the gate, this might "not" be your shoe. But for style? The Mid 1 "absolutely" kills it. Conversely, who should skip it? Hardcore performance players, obviously. Also, if you have "very" wide feet, the break-in could be tough. And if you're a purest who believes only the Air Jordan 1 High counts? This mid-top version might feel like a compromise. It's all about your personal preference and needs.

• Shown: Black Cat
• Style: 555088-402