Air jordan mid 1 : Honestly, I was curious about the comfort difference between Highs and Mids [2oo5kb8l]

After wearing these Air Jordan Mid 1s all day, I can say they're very similar — which means firm! Don't expect Boost or React. The advantage? That slightly lower collar gives a "tiny" bit more ankle mobility. If you have wider feet or just don't like a super-high top, the Mid is the move from the Jordan 1 series. From a pure style perspective, the Air Jordan 1 Mid "slays". I wore these with tapered sweats and the look was "clean". The design is so strong it elevates simple outfits. Performance-wise? It's a 1985 basketball shoe — treat it as such. Great for walking, not for running or hooping seriously. Ideal for the style-focused wearer who values heritage over hype. Sliding these Air Jordan Mid 1s on... the fit is "true-to-size" for me. The ankle collar on the Mid is a "touch" lower than the OG Highs, which I actually prefer for daily wear—it's less restrictive! The cushioning? Let's be real, it's classic Jordan 1: firm & responsive, not plush. If you want cloud-like comfort, this isn't it. But for that court-feel & style? Unbeatable. Now, a potential "con": the comfort tech is dated. If you're coming from modern sneakers with Zoom or Boost, the firm ride of the "air jordan mid 1" will be noticeable. It breaks in, but don't expect plushness. Also, the Mid cut can feel a bit "in-between" for some—not as supportive as a High, not as minimal as a Low. Something to consider.

• Shown: Lightning
• Style: DZ5485-410