Verdict? My feet felt fine for casual use—mall, coffee, etc. But after a few hours? You'll notice the firm midsole. It's part of the charm, honestly. For pure style points, they're a 10/10. For comfort... maybe a 6. Conversely, who should skip it? Hardcore comfort seekers, for sure. Also, if you're a purest for the original '85 High OG shape and details, the Mid’s proportions might feel off. And if you already have multiple similar colorways in the Jordan series, this might be a pass. It’s a fantastic shoe, but it doesn’t reinvent the wheel. How do they look on camera? Honestly, the Mid cut is super versatile. Sometimes Highs can look a bit bulky, but the "Air Jordan Mid 1" sits just right. This "Neutral Grey" pair I'm wearing is "clean". It works with jeans, joggers—you name it. The design is timeless; it’s why this model stays relevant. Compared to a Dunk, the toe box is slightly roomier, which I prefer. A definite "pro" is its effortless style. A "con"? The flat, non-supportive insole might not be for everyone with foot issues. On feet, the design really shines. The color blocking on this pair is clean and sharp. In natural light, the leather has a nice sheen. It's a timeless look that works with so much. Compared to some OG Highs, the Air Jordan Mid 1 sacrifices a bit of that "iconic" height, but honestly? For most casual fits, this is perfect. It's a classic, just a bit shorter.
