Terms of the offer
.. slightly less iconic, but also less bulky around the ankle. It's a more casual, accessible vibe. Versus a Low? The Mid offers more ankle structure. For the price point? It's a compelling option in the "Jordan" lineup, bridging that gap between Highs and Lows perfectly. Just got these in – the "Air Jordan Mid 1" in the ‘Banned’ color-blocking. The red hits against black are just "fire" on camera. Construction seems solid overall. Sliding into them, the fit is familiar and secure. Weight-wise, they're noticeably lighter than my AJ1 Highs, which I actually prefer for walking. The pro here is sheer versatility and that instant recognizability. However, the insole is pretty basic, so consider an upgrade if you're on your feet all day. Personally? I think this model is perfect for someone who wants the iconic look without the High-top commitment or price. Not a performance pick, but a style staple. How do they look on camera? Honestly, the Mid cut is super versatile. Sometimes Highs can look a bit bulky, but the "Air Jordan Mid 1" sits just right. This "Neutral Grey" pair I'm wearing is "clean". It works with jeans, joggers—you name it. The design is timeless; it’s why this model stays relevant. Compared to a Dunk, the toe box is slightly roomier, which I prefer. A definite "pro" is its effortless style. A "con"? The flat, non-supportive insole might not be for everyone with foot issues. Opening the box, the quality is... "expected" for a mid-tier Jordan. It's not premium, but it's not bad either. The real win for the Air Jordan Mid 1 is the colorway variety. You can find almost any combo you want. For a sneakerhead starting their collection, or someone who just wants a reliable, iconic design, it's a great option. Not for the "materials snob" though.
- Shown: Infrared
- Style: CT8012-005
