Air jordan mid 1 : Comparing it directly to an Air Jordan 1 High, the Mid obviously gives you less ankle coverage [3izcm5vd]

For some, that's a plus for mobility and a cleaner look. For pure, classic basketball aesthetic, the High wins. But for daily versatility? The Mid 1 holds its own, no doubt. Alright, so I just unboxed these Air Jordan Mid 1s in the "University Blue" colorway, and "wow" – the color pop is immediate. The leather feels decent for the $125 price point, and that classic Mid silhouette is just "chef's kiss". It's a straightforward, clean Jordan 1, no crazy gimmicks. If you love the AJ1 look but want something a bit more accessible — price-wise and height-wise — than the Highs, this is a solid pick. Here’s my real take: the Air Jordan Mid 1 is the "workhorse" of the Jordan line. At around $125, it's a more entry-level price to get the iconic look. The "Black Toe" color blocking is just "perfection" — always has been. The flat leather won't win luxury awards, but it's durable. Perfect for someone who wants a beater pair of Jordans that still look fire. Not for comfort seekers, though. So, final verdict? The "Air Jordan Mid 1" is a recommend from me—with context. It's for the style-conscious person who appreciates heritage. It's "not" for the performance athlete or the comfort-first wearer. At "$125 USD", it's a fair deal for an icon. You're buying into the legacy. Would I choose it over a High if both were retail? Probably not. But for availability and value, the Mid wins. It's a cornerstone shoe. What do you think? Let me know in the comments below

• Shown: Blank Canvas
• Style: CT8532-401