The fit is true to size for me. The padding around the ankle on the Mid is noticeable—it's comfortable and gives good support for casual wear. The footbed isn't plush by any means, but it's not uncomfortable either. It's that classic, flat feel. If you're used to modern, cushioned sneakers, the Air Jordan 1 Mid might feel a bit firm at first. Comparing it to other Jordans? If you're used to the OG High "AJ1", you'll notice the ankle height difference immediately—it's a personal preference thing. Compared to something like a Jordan 3 or 4, the "air jordan mid 1" is noticeably lighter and more low-profile. It's less about tech and more about that iconic, simple silhouette. A different vibe in the Jordan series lineup. Alright, let's get into these Air Jordan Mid 1s. First impression out of the box? The shape & construction are on point — super clean! This classic silhouette always hits. I got the "White/University Red" colorway, & for $135 USD, the materials feel solid. The leather is decent, not super premium, but honestly? For a Mid, it's exactly what I expected. A great entry into the Jordan series, for sure. Alright, so the "Air Jordan Mid 1" just landed. First impression? This ‘Racer Blue’ colorway "really" pops in-hand. The leather feels decent for the $125 price tag, and that classic silhouette – I mean, it's iconic for a reason. Putting them on, the fit is true-to-size with a snug, comfortable wrap. Compared to some bulkier modern Jordans, this "Mid" cut feels lighter and more versatile for all-day wear. For me, the look is the biggest pro. The con? The cushioning is basic—don't expect Boost-like comfort. Verdict: Great for style-first collectors or casual wear. Not for performance ball or if you need max cushion.
- Shown: Georgetown
- Style: 378037-003
Available
Market Leader | Sales exceeded 10K+
-
Guaranteed PurchaseIt will open in a new window, receive the product you are expecting or we will refund your money.
Product reviews
Characteristics assessment
| Cost-benefit | |
| Comfortable | |
| It's light | |
| Quality of materials | |
| popular |
