Air jordan mid 1 : Comparing it to a High? The Air Jordan Mid 1 lacks the iconic high-top collar and that "ultimate" ankle lockdown [5id2sobo]

For ball, I'd go High. But for style? The Mid is way easier to throw on and go. It sits between the High and the Low, offering a unique profile that's super wearable. A great alternative in the Jordan series. Sliding these Air Jordan Mid 1s on... the fit is TTS (true to size) for me. Immediate thoughts? The ankle collar provides nice support — more than a Low, less than a High. The cushioning is... well, it's an '85-inspired shoe, so don't expect Boost-level softness. It's firm but comfortable for all-day wear. The "overall" feel is classic, stable, & just "simple". On foot now. The fit is true to size for me. The Air Jordan Mid 1 has a decent break-in period – the ankle collar is a bit stiff at first? The cushioning is… well, it's an AJ1. You're getting that classic, firm court feel, not modern squish. It's about heritage, not cloud-like comfort. Honestly, I dig that for all-day wear. Comparing these to other Jordans? The Air Jordan Mid 1 sits perfectly between the High & the Low. You lose some of the High's "legendary" ankle coverage & styling options, but you gain a bit more everyday flexibility. Versus a modern Jordan like the 36? It's a completely different world — this is about heritage, not performance tech. For $135 USD, it's a style piece.

• Shown: Bloodline
• Style: DM9036-104