Air jordan mid 1 : Potential downside? The ankle padding isn't as thick as on some Highs [6k3cyv2d]

If you have super sensitive ankles, that's something to note. Also, the outsole traction is good for walking, but I wouldn't recommend these for actual balling—that's not their purpose anymore. As a lifestyle shoe, the Air Jordan Mid 1 absolutely delivers on its promise. Here's the pro: Timeless style. You can't go wrong with a "Jordan 1 Mid". Cons? The break-in period can be stiff, & the materials vary by colorway. For ~$135 USD~, you're paying for the "iconic design" more than premium tech. It's a lifestyle sneaker, first & foremost. Who should "maybe" skip it? Hardcore performance basketball players — this isn't your modern tool. Also, if ultimate, cloud-like comfort is your #1 priority, look at newer models. And if you're a purist who "only" rocks Highs for that authentic look, the Mid's shorter collar might not do it for you. But for most? It's a "solid", iconic choice. The major "pro" here is versatility and legacy. You're wearing a piece of sneaker history (well, a version of it). The construction is generally durable for everyday use. However, the "con" for some will be the lack of premium materials or that exact OG specification. If you're a purist, you might only want the Highs.

• Shown: Guava Ice
• Style: 555088-135