Air jordan mid 1 : Comparing it directly to the AJ1 High? The "air jordan mid 1" obviously has one less lace hole, so the ankle feel is different—a bit more free [7b8bho56]

Some purists will always prefer the High, and I get that! But for casual, all-day comfort and easier on/off, I actually prefer the Mid. It's a personal thing, really. Final verdict? For "$135 USD", this "Air Jordan Mid 1" is an easy recommend for a style - focused sneakerhead. It's a classic design, incredibly easy to wear, and represents the "Jordan series" legacy well. Just know what you're getting: a stylish, historic shoe, not a comfort - first modern sneaker. Solid pickup Let's talk looks. On camera, the Air Jordan Mid 1's profile is "clean". This Mid cut offers a "versatile" look—it works with "both" shorts and pants, which is a huge plus. Compared to the Jordan 1 High, it's "less" bulky. The "advantage" here is its "accessibility"; it's often easier to find for retail. The "downside"? Some purists will "always" prefer the High-top's iconic "style". So, final verdict? The "Air Jordan Mid 1" is a recommend from me—with context. It's for the style-conscious person who appreciates heritage. It's "not" for the performance athlete or the comfort-first wearer. At "$125 USD", it's a fair deal for an icon. You're buying into the legacy. Would I choose it over a High if both were retail? Probably not. But for availability and value, the Mid wins. It's a cornerstone shoe. What do you think? Let me know in the comments below

• Shown: Canyon Purple
• Style: 555088-036