Air jordan mid 1 : Here's a potential con, though- purists might argue it's not the "OG" High cut [81dpjhf8]

And you know what? They're right. But not everyone needs or wants that. If you're a stickler for the original 1985 specs, this isn't it. But for a stylish, wearable sneaker? It absolutely gets the job done. For new sneakerheads, I often recommend starting with a Mid. It lets you experience the Jordan 1 silhouette and see if you like the fit/feel before investing in pricier Highs or collaborations. This particular colorway is a classic for a reason—it’s just easy to wear. The brand recognition is, of course, through the roof. Just unboxed the "Air Jordan Mid 1" ‘Starfish’ – that orange is "crazy" bright. Initial impression is strong; the paint and stitching are clean. Wearing them, the fit is standard and comfortable for a lifestyle shoe. On foot, they demand attention – in a good way. Versus a neutral Jordan, this is for making a statement. The advantage is bold style at a relatively accessible price point (~$125). The trade-off? That bold color might limit your outfit choices. My final thought: This is for the style risk-taker who loves color. If you prefer a "one-shoe-matches-everything" approach, a more neutral "Mid" might be a better fit for your collection. Honest talk about the feel: The "air jordan mid 1" is not a "plush" shoe. Your foot sits "on" the platform, not "in" it, if that makes sense. The arch support is minimal. If you're used to modern, engineered sneakers, this will feel... basic. But that's also its charm - it's pure, unfiltered heritage basketball design.

• Shown: Shadow
• Style: DM9036-104