Air jordan mid 1 : Here's a potential con, though- purists might argue it's not the "OG" High cut [8rb5bov2]

And you know what? They're right. But not everyone needs or wants that. If you're a stickler for the original 1985 specs, this isn't it. But for a stylish, wearable sneaker? It absolutely gets the job done. On-camera review of this "Air Jordan Mid 1" ‘Black Toe’. Man, this colorway is legendary. In-hand, the leather has a nice grain. Upon wearing, the support is great – true to the shoe's heritage. It looks sharp and timeless on foot. Compared to other Jordan models, this is pure, unfiltered history. The pro is its iconic status and versatile color-blocking. The con is the lack of modern cushioning tech; it's a firm ride. For around $125, you're buying into a piece of sneaker culture. I'd say it's a must for collectors of classic silhouettes. Not for those seeking a cloud-like, modern sneaker experience – and that's okay! Comparing it directly to the AJ1 High? The "air jordan mid 1" obviously has one less lace hole, so the ankle feel is different—a bit more free. Some purists will always prefer the High, and I get that! But for casual, all-day comfort and easier on/off, I actually prefer the Mid. It's a personal thing, really. Alright, so I just unboxed these Air Jordan Mid 1s in the "University Blue" colorway, and "wow" – the color pop is immediate. The leather feels decent for the $125 price point, and that classic Mid silhouette is just "chef's kiss". It's a straightforward, clean Jordan 1, no crazy gimmicks. If you love the AJ1 look but want something a bit more accessible — price-wise and height-wise — than the Highs, this is a solid pick.

• Shown: Blank Canvas
• Style: DZ5485-410