Air jordan mid 1 : Comparing this AJ1 Mid to my other Jordans? It fills a perfect niche [9brqbzae]

It’s more accessible—both in price (~$135) and style—than chasing OG Highs. Versus something like a Jordan 3 or 4? The Mid 1 is "much" lighter on foot and has that timeless, minimalist profile. It's a foundational sneaker in any collection, no doubt. Major PROS? 1) "Timeless Style" — you can't go wrong with this silhouette. 2) "Great Price Point" — within the Jordan series, $135 USD is relatively accessible. 3) "Easy to Wear" — the Mid cut works for almost "anyone's" lifestyle. It's a fantastic "introductory" model if you're new to sneakers, or a reliable staple if you've been collecting for years. How do they look on camera? Honestly, the Mid cut is super versatile. Sometimes Highs can look a bit bulky, but the "Air Jordan Mid 1" sits just right. This "Neutral Grey" pair I'm wearing is "clean". It works with jeans, joggers—you name it. The design is timeless; it’s why this model stays relevant. Compared to a Dunk, the toe box is slightly roomier, which I prefer. A definite "pro" is its effortless style. A "con"? The flat, non-supportive insole might not be for everyone with foot issues. Opening the box, the quality is... "expected" for a mid-tier Jordan. It's not premium, but it's not bad either. The real win for the Air Jordan Mid 1 is the colorway variety. You can find almost any combo you want. For a sneakerhead starting their collection, or someone who just wants a reliable, iconic design, it's a great option. Not for the "materials snob" though.

• Shown: Lightning
• Style: CT8532-008