Air jordan mid 1 : Potential con? The tech, or lack thereof [9lfpm8te]

It's a 1985 design, so the cushioning is basic. If you're used to modern, plush sneakers, the firm feel might be a shock. Also, the ankle collar on this Mid cut — while comfortable — offers less lockdown than a High for actual basketball. Know what you're buying: a lifestyle icon, "not" a performance beast. Final thought: who might want to skip the Air Jordan Mid 1? If you demand the highest level of cushioning tech, or if you "only" collect original High OG silhouettes, then maybe look elsewhere. But for 99% of people wanting a stylish, durable, and iconic sneaker? Yeah, this is a very easy recommendation from me. Styling these is where the shoe shines. This "Gym Red" colorblocking is incredibly versatile—it goes with almost anything. The Mid height is a great middle-ground; it's not as tall as the OG High, but it's more substantial than a low. On camera or in person, that classic Jordan 1 silhouette just always works. A true wardrobe staple, honestly. Wearing these around, I appreciate the "Mid" cut more and more. It offers that classic "Jordan 1" profile but is easier to get on and off than the Highs. There's a certain nostalgia factor with the "Air Jordan Mid 1" that modern retros sometimes lack. It feels authentic, like a direct link to the court styles of the past.

• Shown: Pure Money
• Style: DZ5485-410