Air jordan mid 1 : Comparing it to the OG Highs? The Air Jordan Mid 1 obviously has a shorter collar [9mfnbedb]

It's easier to get on and off. Some purists might miss the full high-top look, but for everyday versatility? I think the Mid is a winner. The price point is also generally better, often under $130 USD. Who are these for? I'd say they're perfect for someone entering the sneaker world, or anyone wanting a reliable, stylish daily shoe. Students, casual wearers, folks who love the AJ1 look but maybe find Highs too tall or too expensive. At around $135 USD, it's a relatively low-risk way to get that iconic Jordan Brand look in your rotation. How do they look on camera? Honestly, the Mid cut is super versatile. Sometimes Highs can look a bit bulky, but the "Air Jordan Mid 1" sits just right. This "Neutral Grey" pair I'm wearing is "clean". It works with jeans, joggers—you name it. The design is timeless; it’s why this model stays relevant. Compared to a Dunk, the toe box is slightly roomier, which I prefer. A definite "pro" is its effortless style. A "con"? The flat, non-supportive insole might not be for everyone with foot issues. Let's talk looks. This "University Blue" pair pops on camera! The mix of leather and synthetic materials gives it good depth. On foot, the Mid cut sits "perfectly" for my style – high enough to look classic, low enough to be super versatile with pants or shorts. It's a timeless, clean look that just works.

• Shown: Infrared
• Style: AQ9129-103