Air jordan mid 1 : Now, potential cons (gotta be real) [b3lpaxaj]

Purists will "always" argue for the High top. The materials, while good, aren't always "top-tier" like some Special Edition Jordans. If you need max ankle support for ball, look elsewhere. It’s a lifestyle sneaker first. That's the honest truth with this air jordan mid 1. Comparing it to other Jordans... The Air Jordan Mid 1 is like the "accessible" sibling. Next to a Jordan 3 or 4 with Air units, it feels "basic" underfoot. But! Its "simplicity" is its strength. It's "lighter" than most retro models and "easier" to style. For a first Jordan? "Solid" choice. For a comfort-first sneakerhead? "Maybe" look "elsewhere". Conversely, who should skip it? Hardcore comfort seekers, for sure. Also, if you're a purest for the original '85 High OG shape and details, the Mid’s proportions might feel off. And if you already have multiple similar colorways in the Jordan series, this might be a pass. It’s a fantastic shoe, but it doesn’t reinvent the wheel. Alright, let's get these on foot. So, slipping into this "Air Jordan Mid 1", the fit is true to size for me. The ankle collar is less restrictive than a High, which is a plus for all-day wear. Comfort? It's a classic court shoe—don't expect Boost or React. It's firm, but in a good, supportive way for casual use. The "Jordan series" mid cut is seriously underrated for daily comfort.

• Shown: Cherry
• Style: 308497-060