For ball, I'd go High. But for style? The Mid is way easier to throw on and go. It sits between the High and the Low, offering a unique profile that's super wearable. A great alternative in the Jordan series. So, would I personally cop? Yeah, I already did. This 'Chicago' "air jordan mid 1" is staying in my rotation. It's not my most comfortable shoe, but it's one I grab when I want that effortless, classic look. It bridges gaps in an outfit easily. For $135, it delivers exactly what it promises: a wearable piece of sneaker history. Hope this real-talk review helped you decide! Straight up, the biggest "pro" here is the accessibility. You can actually find and buy these. The "Air Jordan Mid 1" sits at a great price point, around "$125 USD". The design is nearly identical to the High from afar. The "con"? Some sneakerheads will always see it as the "little brother" to the High OG. But honestly? That's their loss. This shoe stands on its own. The mid-top height is practical and stylish. If you want the look without the hype or resell price, this is your answer. Who should maybe skip it? Serious ballers looking for modern performance tech – look at newer models. Also, if you have very wide feet, the fit can be snug. And if you "only" want the highest OG form, you'll likely stick to the Highs. But for most? This Mid is a great choice.
