You lose some of the High's "legendary" ankle coverage & styling options, but you gain a bit more everyday flexibility. Versus a modern Jordan like the 36? It's a completely different world — this is about heritage, not performance tech. For $135 USD, it's a style piece. Who should maybe skip it? If you need maximum comfort, arch support, or a performance-oriented shoe - look elsewhere. Also, if you're only interested in the most premium materials and details, you might be disappointed. The "air jordan mid 1" is about the silhouette and heritage first. It's not trying to be a luxury item or a tech marvel. Let's talk looks. On camera, the Air Jordan Mid 1's profile is "clean". This Mid cut offers a "versatile" look—it works with "both" shorts and pants, which is a huge plus. Compared to the Jordan 1 High, it's "less" bulky. The "advantage" here is its "accessibility"; it's often easier to find for retail. The "downside"? Some purists will "always" prefer the High-top's iconic "style". Here's a potential con, though: purists might argue it's not the "OG" High cut. And you know what? They're right. But not everyone needs or wants that. If you're a stickler for the original 1985 specs, this isn't it. But for a stylish, wearable sneaker? It absolutely gets the job done.
