Terms of the offer
Also, if you already own several OG Highs and are "only" interested in premium materials, the mids might feel like a step down. But remember, it's a different shoe with its own purpose! Don't sleep on the "Jordan 1 Mid" just because of the height. On foot now. The fit is true to size for me. The Air Jordan Mid 1 has a decent break-in period – the ankle collar is a bit stiff at first? The cushioning is… well, it's an AJ1. You're getting that classic, firm court feel, not modern squish. It's about heritage, not cloud-like comfort. Honestly, I dig that for all-day wear. Let's talk looks. On camera, the Air Jordan Mid 1's profile is "clean". This Mid cut offers a "versatile" look—it works with "both" shorts and pants, which is a huge plus. Compared to the Jordan 1 High, it's "less" bulky. The "advantage" here is its "accessibility"; it's often easier to find for retail. The "downside"? Some purists will "always" prefer the High-top's iconic "style". So, final verdict? The "Air Jordan Mid 1" is a recommend from me—with context. It's for the style-conscious person who appreciates heritage. It's "not" for the performance athlete or the comfort-first wearer. At "$125 USD", it's a fair deal for an icon. You're buying into the legacy. Would I choose it over a High if both were retail? Probably not. But for availability and value, the Mid wins. It's a cornerstone shoe. What do you think? Let me know in the comments below
- Shown: Black Cat
- Style: CZ6509-100
