Also, if you're a purest for the original '85 High OG shape and details, the Mid’s proportions might feel off. And if you already have multiple similar colorways in the Jordan series, this might be a pass. It’s a fantastic shoe, but it doesn’t reinvent the wheel. Conversely, who should maybe avoid it? If you prioritize ultra-plush, modern cushioning above all else—this isn't it. Also, if you have flat feet or need major arch support, the firm insole might not be for you. It's a style-first, heritage-performance shoe. Just keeping it 100% real with you guys. Now, a real talk moment. The possible downside? Some purists will "always" favor the OG Highs for their "authentic" design and often better material quality. The cushioning in this "Air Jordan Mid 1" is pretty standard—don't go playing a full-court game in them. If you need supreme comfort or are a detail-obsessed collector, you might look elsewhere. But for style? Hard to beat. So, I put the Air Jordan Mid 1 on foot. Initial feel? The ankle collar is "noticeably" lower than a High. The "cushioning" is firm—it's not super plush or "anything". You're getting that classic, "flat" court feel. The break-in period is real; these can be stiff at first. "Honestly", if you want supreme comfort out the gate, this might "not" be your shoe. But for style? The Mid 1 "absolutely" kills it.
