Air jordan mid 1 : Here's a potential con, though- purists might argue it's not the "OG" High cut [e1b13knc]

And you know what? They're right. But not everyone needs or wants that. If you're a stickler for the original 1985 specs, this isn't it. But for a stylish, wearable sneaker? It absolutely gets the job done. So, I put the Air Jordan Mid 1 on foot. Initial feel? The ankle collar is "noticeably" lower than a High. The "cushioning" is firm—it's not super plush or "anything". You're getting that classic, "flat" court feel. The break-in period is real; these can be stiff at first. "Honestly", if you want supreme comfort out the gate, this might "not" be your shoe. But for style? The Mid 1 "absolutely" kills it. Alright, what's up everyone? Just unboxed this pair of "air jordan mid 1"s in the "Banned" colorway, and wow—the leather quality honestly surprised me? It's not top-tier but for a $135 USD shoe, it's pretty solid. The iconic silhouette is instantly recognizable, of course. My first thought? They look great out of the box, ready to rock straight away. Who might wanna skip it? Hardcore comfort seekers, for sure. If your priority is all-day walking comfort, modern materials, or advanced cushioning—this isn't it. Also, if you're a dedicated OG High-top collector, the "Mid" cut might feel like a compromise. It serves a different purpose: style and accessibility over pure heritage or tech.

• Shown: Cool Grey
• Style: 555088-403