Air jordan mid 1 : Now, potential cons (gotta be real) [e9f52pkg]

Purists will "always" argue for the High top. The materials, while good, aren't always "top-tier" like some Special Edition Jordans. If you need max ankle support for ball, look elsewhere. It’s a lifestyle sneaker first. That's the honest truth with this air jordan mid 1. Conversely, who should maybe avoid it? If you prioritize ultra-plush, modern cushioning above all else—this isn't it. Also, if you have flat feet or need major arch support, the firm insole might not be for you. It's a style-first, heritage-performance shoe. Just keeping it 100% real with you guys. Alright, on feet now. The comfort? It's a firm, grounded ride — exactly what you expect from an AJ1. Don't come here looking for Boost or Zoom cushioning; it's about that classic, connected-to-the-floor feel. The Air Jordan Mid 1 hugs my foot nicely, "though" the break-in period is real — the heel area is a bit stiff initially. For casual wear and style, though? It's perfect. Here's my real take: The Air Jordan Mid 1 is a "practical" sneaker. Pros? "Timeless" design, relatively affordable (~$120-135 USD), and "tons" of colorways to choose from. Cons? That "stiff" leather and basic insole won't win any comfort awards. "Ultimately", I'd recommend it to someone who "loves" the Jordan 1 look but wants a more "low-key", everyday option than the High.

• Shown: Infrared
• Style: CK5666 100