Air jordan mid 1 : Comparing it directly to the AJ1 High? The "air jordan mid 1" obviously has one less lace hole, so the ankle feel is different—a bit more free [f0y5hddc]

Some purists will always prefer the High, and I get that! But for casual, all-day comfort and easier on/off, I actually prefer the Mid. It's a personal thing, really. Conversely, who should skip it? Hardcore performance players, obviously. Also, if you have "very" wide feet, the break-in could be tough. And if you're a purest who believes only the Air Jordan 1 High counts? This mid-top version might feel like a compromise. It's all about your personal preference and needs. Here's a detailed look at this 'Dark Concord' Air Jordan Mid. That purple is deeper in person—really unique. Construction is standard Jordan Mid quality. My true size fit perfectly, no pinching. The footbed is firm, offering decent arch support for a flat shoe. Compared to a Dunk, it feels more structured. Pro: Incredibly easy to style with jeans or shorts. Con: The price has crept up to $135 on some colorways. I'd recommend these to a sneaker fan wanting a durable, iconic shoe. Final verdict? For me, the "air jordan mid 1" is a recommend. It's a classic, wearable sneaker that gets the job done. You're paying for the design heritage and a timeless look. Just go in with the right expectations on comfort, and you'll be happy. It's a staple for a reason, and this particular version executes that idea very well.

• Shown: Game Royal
• Style: AV2187-160