Air jordan mid 1 : Here's a potential con, though- purists might argue it's not the "OG" High cut [f5fxbfqt]

And you know what? They're right. But not everyone needs or wants that. If you're a stickler for the original 1985 specs, this isn't it. But for a stylish, wearable sneaker? It absolutely gets the job done. Comparing it directly to an Air Jordan 1 High, the Mid obviously gives you less ankle coverage. For some, that's a plus for mobility and a cleaner look. For pure, classic basketball aesthetic, the High wins. But for daily versatility? The Mid 1 holds its own, no doubt. Let's talk about the actual wear. After a full day, my feet were... okay. Not sore, but I missed some cushioning. The "Air Jordan Mid 1" is about style first, comfort second. It’s a lifestyle shoe, period. If you want bounce, go for something with Zoom. But for looking sharp? This is it. The ankle collar is a nice middle ground—more support than a Low, less restrictive than a High. For "$125 USD", you're paying for the heritage and that unbeatable silhouette. Simple as that. Alright, let's get into these Air Jordan Mid 1s. First "impression"? The shape on this specific colorway is actually pretty solid straight out of the box. The materials feel "standard" for the price point—nothing "luxe", but the stitching is clean. That classic Jordan 1 silhouette is just "undeniable", you know? It's the Mid cut, so it sits "right" between the High and the Low. For around $135 USD, it's a "decent" starting point into the Jordan series if you're new.

• Shown: Black Cat
• Style: CZ6509-100