Air jordan mid 1 : Potential con? The tech, or lack thereof [f6bcede7]

It's a 1985 design, so the cushioning is basic. If you're used to modern, plush sneakers, the firm feel might be a shock. Also, the ankle collar on this Mid cut — while comfortable — offers less lockdown than a High for actual basketball. Know what you're buying: a lifestyle icon, "not" a performance beast. Comparing it directly to the Air Jordan 1 High? The main difference is, of course, the collar height. The "air jordan mid 1" gives you slightly more ankle freedom, which I actually prefer for all-day wear. However, some purists might miss the complete, iconic High top look. For $125, it's a more accessible entry point into the Jordan 1 lineage, which is a big plus. Alright, let's get into these Air Jordan Mid 1s. First off, the shape & build quality here? Pretty solid. This specific colorway has a clean, classic look that just "works". Unboxing them, you get that iconic Jordan 1 silhouette immediately. For $125 USD, the materials feel appropriate, nothing premium, but definitely durable. It's a straightforward, no-nonsense start with this "air jordan mid 1". So, I put the Air Jordan Mid 1 on foot. Initial feel? The ankle collar is "noticeably" lower than a High. The "cushioning" is firm—it's not super plush or "anything". You're getting that classic, "flat" court feel. The break-in period is real; these can be stiff at first. "Honestly", if you want supreme comfort out the gate, this might "not" be your shoe. But for style? The Mid 1 "absolutely" kills it.

• Shown: Royal Toe
• Style: 555088-711