It's not buttery-soft leather, it's more of a grained, durable finish. For the cost, it's acceptable. You won't get the luxury feel of some High OG releases, but that's reflected in the price. This "Jordan" series offering is about the silhouette and color first. It's built to last as a casual wear shoe. So, final verdict? The "Air Jordan Mid 1" is a recommend from me—with context. It's for the style-conscious person who appreciates heritage. It's "not" for the performance athlete or the comfort-first wearer. At "$125 USD", it's a fair deal for an icon. You're buying into the legacy. Would I choose it over a High if both were retail? Probably not. But for availability and value, the Mid wins. It's a cornerstone shoe. What do you think? Let me know in the comments below On feet now, and let's talk feel. The "air jordan mid 1" is a retro basketball shoe, so don't expect modern, plush cushioning. It's firm. The ankle support from the mid-top cut is noticeable and good for casual wear. The toe box has room, which I prefer. It's not a heavy shoe, but you feel its presence. If you're used to ultra-boosts or React, this will be a different, more grounded experience. Who might wanna skip it? Hardcore comfort seekers, for sure. If your priority is all-day walking comfort, modern materials, or advanced cushioning—this isn't it. Also, if you're a dedicated OG High-top collector, the "Mid" cut might feel like a compromise. It serves a different purpose: style and accessibility over pure heritage or tech.
