Air jordan mid 1 : Comparing it to other Jordans? If you're used to the OG High "AJ1", you'll notice the ankle height difference immediately—it's a personal preference thing [g1f9dsct]

Compared to something like a Jordan 3 or 4, the "air jordan mid 1" is noticeably lighter and more low-profile. It's less about tech and more about that iconic, simple silhouette. A different vibe in the Jordan series lineup. Who should maybe skip it? If you need maximum comfort, arch support, or a performance-oriented shoe - look elsewhere. Also, if you're only interested in the most premium materials and details, you might be disappointed. The "air jordan mid 1" is about the silhouette and heritage first. It's not trying to be a luxury item or a tech marvel. Sliding these on... the fit is true to size for me. The ankle collar on the Mid is a nice middle ground - more support than a Low, but easier to get on than a High. They feel "secure", but that classic Air Jordan 1 midsole? Let's be real: it's firm. Don't expect crazy cushioning here. It's about that classic, connected-to-the-court feel. Comparing it to a High? The Air Jordan Mid 1 lacks the iconic high-top collar and that "ultimate" ankle lockdown. For ball, I'd go High. But for style? The Mid is way easier to throw on and go. It sits between the High and the Low, offering a unique profile that's super wearable. A great alternative in the Jordan series.

• Shown: Court Purple
• Style: DZ5485-612