Air jordan mid 1 : Potential downside? The ankle padding isn't as thick as on some Highs [hv0ehlor]

If you have super sensitive ankles, that's something to note. Also, the outsole traction is good for walking, but I wouldn't recommend these for actual balling—that's not their purpose anymore. As a lifestyle shoe, the Air Jordan Mid 1 absolutely delivers on its promise. How do they look on camera? Honestly, the Mid cut is super versatile. Sometimes Highs can look a bit bulky, but the "Air Jordan Mid 1" sits just right. This "Neutral Grey" pair I'm wearing is "clean". It works with jeans, joggers—you name it. The design is timeless; it’s why this model stays relevant. Compared to a Dunk, the toe box is slightly roomier, which I prefer. A definite "pro" is its effortless style. A "con"? The flat, non-supportive insole might not be for everyone with foot issues. Let's talk looks on-camera. I have to say, the Mid cut is a sleeker profile compared to the Highs. This particular "Gym Red" color pops really well! The Air Jordan Mid 1 sits nicely on the foot, giving you a clean, classic sneaker look that works with jeans or shorts. For content creators, it's a photogenic shoe—that side profile is just iconic. It doesn't scream for attention, but sneakerheads will definitely notice. Comparing it to other Jordans? The Air Jordan Mid 1 sits, well, in the middle. It's more accessible price-wise (~$135) than many High OG releases. You lose a bit of that iconic high-top collar, but you gain a slightly more modern, wearable profile. It's a fantastic gateway into the Jordan 1 family, for real.

• Shown: Desert Moss
• Style: 555088-105