Terms of the offer
.. If you have a High, you don't "need" a Mid, but it's a different vibe. The "Air Jordan Mid 1" is easier to put on and off, for sure. It’s less of a statement, more of an everyday shoe. I find myself grabbing these for quick errands more often than my Highs. The price difference in the "Jordan series" makes the Mid a fantastic entry point. Just know the materials might be slightly different—sometimes less leather, more synthetic. Still a great shoe for the money. Let's talk materials on this 'Particle Grey' Air Jordan Mid 1. It uses a mix of leather and synthetic—it's fine for the cost. On foot, they feel lighter than they look! The ankle padding is sufficient. The design is just "chef's kiss"—it's why the Jordan 1 Mid remains popular. Honestly, the biggest advantage over the High is often availability and price. Not a performance shoe by any means. Perfect for casual wear, not for balling or long-distance walks. My final take? I like them. For the price, you can't go wrong with a clean colorway. This "University Blue" "Air Jordan Mid 1" is fire. They're durable, they look great, and they're part of sneaker history. Would I recommend them? Yes, but with caveats. Don't expect cloud-like comfort. Do expect compliments and a versatile shoe for your rotation. It's a workhorse in the "Jordan series". For "$125 USD", it's a sensible, stylish pickup. Just break them in slowly! Straight up, the biggest "pro" here is the accessibility. You can actually find and buy these. The "Air Jordan Mid 1" sits at a great price point, around "$125 USD". The design is nearly identical to the High from afar. The "con"? Some sneakerheads will always see it as the "little brother" to the High OG. But honestly? That's their loss. This shoe stands on its own. The mid-top height is practical and stylish. If you want the look without the hype or resell price, this is your answer.
- Shown: Bred Toe
- Style: BQ4422 100
