Air jordan mid 1 : Alright, so here's the "Air Jordan Mid 1" in hand [jonwm97f]
First impression? The leather quality on this pair is solid for the price point, around "$135 USD". It's not buttery premium, but it's definitely not cheap-feeling. The shape and silhouette are instantly recognizable—it's that classic Jordan 1 look we all love, just with the mid-top cut. For a quick, versatile pickup in the Jordan series, this is a strong start. Alright, let's unbox these "Air Jordan Mid 1s" first. The ~classic silhouette~ is instantly recognizable, & the leather on this colorway feels pretty decent for the $135 USD price point. Honestly, the "Mid" cut is such a versatile look—not too high, not too low. My first impression? Solid. Now, the not-so-great part. If you need plush cushioning for all-day wear or balling, look elsewhere. This is a retro basketball shoe in design only. Also, that stiff leather can crease in a pretty noticeable way. It's part of the charm for some, but if you like your sneakers pristine, this might bug you. Alright, so the "Air Jordan Mid 1" just landed. First impression? This ‘Racer Blue’ colorway "really" pops in-hand. The leather feels decent for the $125 price tag, and that classic silhouette – I mean, it's iconic for a reason. Putting them on, the fit is true-to-size with a snug, comfortable wrap. Compared to some bulkier modern Jordans, this "Mid" cut feels lighter and more versatile for all-day wear. For me, the look is the biggest pro. The con? The cushioning is basic—don't expect Boost-like comfort. Verdict: Great for style-first collectors or casual wear. Not for performance ball or if you need max cushion.
- Shown: Purple Metallic
- Style: CT8527-700
Available
Market Leader | Sales exceeded 10K+
-
Guaranteed PurchaseIt will open in a new window, receive the product you are expecting or we will refund your money.
Product reviews
4.9
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
1
Characteristics assessment
| Cost-benefit |
Rating 4.5 out of 10 5 |
| Comfortable |
Rating 4.3 out of 5 |
| It's light |
Rating 4.3 out of 5 |
| Quality of materials |
Rating 4.1 of 5 |
| popular |
Assessment 4 of 5 |
