Air jordan mid 1 : Comparing it to other Jordans? If you're used to the OG High "AJ1", you'll notice the ankle height difference immediately—it's a personal preference thing [k349trdm]

Compared to something like a Jordan 3 or 4, the "air jordan mid 1" is noticeably lighter and more low-profile. It's less about tech and more about that iconic, simple silhouette. A different vibe in the Jordan series lineup. Unboxing this 'Lucky Green' pair—such a fresh colorway for spring. The green is vibrant! Initial try-on: snug in the toe box (I'd maybe go half up if you have wider feet). The build feels consistent. On feet, they turn heads; the Mid height is very flattering. A clear pro is the versatility within the Jordan 1 family—mids often have more playful colors. Possible con? Some purists still sleep on the Mid model. I say ignore them if you like the style and color. Major pro? The style-to-price ratio. For $135, you're getting a piece of sneaker history — a design that never goes out of fashion. The build on my pair is clean, with minimal glue stains or flaws. The Air Jordan Mid 1 is a reliable, head-turning sneaker that won't obliterate your wallet. That's a "huge" win in today's market. So, I put the Air Jordan Mid 1 on foot. Initial feel? The ankle collar is "noticeably" lower than a High. The "cushioning" is firm—it's not super plush or "anything". You're getting that classic, "flat" court feel. The break-in period is real; these can be stiff at first. "Honestly", if you want supreme comfort out the gate, this might "not" be your shoe. But for style? The Mid 1 "absolutely" kills it.

• Shown: Desert Moss
• Style: 555088-311