Opening it up, the materials feel good. The fit is reliable and true-to-size. I love how this colorway looks with jeans or sweats – it's a modern, clean aesthetic. Compared to bulkier sneakers, it's relatively sleek. The pro is its incredible versatility and understated look. The possible con? Some might find it "too plain" compared to flashier Jordans. For $125, it's a fantastic foundational piece in any rotation. I'd recommend it to anyone looking for a quality, go-anywhere sneaker from the "Jordan series". If you crave excitement and pop, you might want a different colorway. Here's my on-feet first look at this new "Air Jordan 1 Mid" ‘Electro Orange’. The color is bold – it looks even better in natural light. Initial comfort is okay; it's a firm, supportive ride typical of the "Jordan 1" lineage. Compared to more padded sneakers, you feel the court roots. I love the confidence this design brings to a fit. The major pro is its statement-making potential. The con? That stiff leather might need some time to soften. At around $125, it's a solid entry into the Jordan world. I'd say it's for those who value color and design history. If you prioritize plush comfort above all, this isn't your shoe. Final verdict? I'm impressed with this specific pair. The color blocking is fire, and the quality is there. The Air Jordan Mid 1 is a reliable, stylish workhorse in the Jordan line. For around $125 USD, it's an easy recommendation for a casual sneakerhead. Now, a real talk CON — the cushioning. If you're used to modern, plush sneakers, the Air Jordan Mid 1 will feel "firm". There's a small Air unit in the heel, but it's not a "comfort-first" shoe. It's built on a 1985 blueprint! Also, the leather quality can vary by colorway. This one's decent, but don't expect super-supple tumbled leather on this specific release.

  • Shown: Infrared
  • Style: CT4954-007

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5