Air jordan mid 1 : Comparing it to other Jordans? If you're used to the OG High "AJ1", you'll notice the ankle height difference immediately—it's a personal preference thing [li5fnipi]

Compared to something like a Jordan 3 or 4, the "air jordan mid 1" is noticeably lighter and more low-profile. It's less about tech and more about that iconic, simple silhouette. A different vibe in the Jordan series lineup. Let's talk looks. On camera, the Air Jordan Mid 1's profile is "clean". This Mid cut offers a "versatile" look—it works with "both" shorts and pants, which is a huge plus. Compared to the Jordan 1 High, it's "less" bulky. The "advantage" here is its "accessibility"; it's often easier to find for retail. The "downside"? Some purists will "always" prefer the High-top's iconic "style". My final take? I like them. For the price, you can't go wrong with a clean colorway. This "University Blue" "Air Jordan Mid 1" is fire. They're durable, they look great, and they're part of sneaker history. Would I recommend them? Yes, but with caveats. Don't expect cloud-like comfort. Do expect compliments and a versatile shoe for your rotation. It's a workhorse in the "Jordan series". For "$125 USD", it's a sensible, stylish pickup. Just break them in slowly! Alright, let's get into these Air Jordan Mid 1s. First "impression"? The shape on this specific colorway is actually pretty solid straight out of the box. The materials feel "standard" for the price point—nothing "luxe", but the stitching is clean. That classic Jordan 1 silhouette is just "undeniable", you know? It's the Mid cut, so it sits "right" between the High and the Low. For around $135 USD, it's a "decent" starting point into the Jordan series if you're new.

• Shown: Blank Canvas
• Style: CT4954-007