Air jordan mid 1 : Comparing these to other Jordans? The Air Jordan Mid 1 sits perfectly between the High & the Low [lsei4rr4]

You lose some of the High's "legendary" ankle coverage & styling options, but you gain a bit more everyday flexibility. Versus a modern Jordan like the 36? It's a completely different world — this is about heritage, not performance tech. For $135 USD, it's a style piece. Who should maybe skip it? Serious ballers looking for modern performance tech – look at newer models. Also, if you have very wide feet, the fit can be snug. And if you "only" want the highest OG form, you'll likely stick to the Highs. But for most? This Mid is a great choice. Just unboxed the "Air Jordan Mid 1" ‘Starfish’ – that orange is "crazy" bright. Initial impression is strong; the paint and stitching are clean. Wearing them, the fit is standard and comfortable for a lifestyle shoe. On foot, they demand attention – in a good way. Versus a neutral Jordan, this is for making a statement. The advantage is bold style at a relatively accessible price point (~$125). The trade-off? That bold color might limit your outfit choices. My final thought: This is for the style risk-taker who loves color. If you prefer a "one-shoe-matches-everything" approach, a more neutral "Mid" might be a better fit for your collection. However, here's a potential con: the comfort. If you're used to plush sneakers like the Jordan 13 or even some newer retros, the Mid 1's firm midsole might feel a bit harsh for all-day wear. It's a shoe built more for style than supreme cushioning, which is totally fine, but you should know that going in.

• Shown: Patent Bred
• Style: CT8012-011