That purple is deeper in person—really unique. Construction is standard Jordan Mid quality. My true size fit perfectly, no pinching. The footbed is firm, offering decent arch support for a flat shoe. Compared to a Dunk, it feels more structured. Pro: Incredibly easy to style with jeans or shorts. Con: The price has crept up to $135 on some colorways. I'd recommend these to a sneaker fan wanting a durable, iconic shoe. Just got these in – the "Air Jordan Mid 1" in the ‘Banned’ color-blocking. The red hits against black are just "fire" on camera. Construction seems solid overall. Sliding into them, the fit is familiar and secure. Weight-wise, they're noticeably lighter than my AJ1 Highs, which I actually prefer for walking. The pro here is sheer versatility and that instant recognizability. However, the insole is pretty basic, so consider an upgrade if you're on your feet all day. Personally? I think this model is perfect for someone who wants the iconic look without the High-top commitment or price. Not a performance pick, but a style staple. Who is this for? Honestly, it's for the style-first crowd. If you love the AJ1 look but find Highs too pricey or formal, this "air jordan mid 1" is your move. It's for collectors wanting the colorway, or beginners starting their rotation. It's not for comfort seekers or performance basketball players – just manage those expectations from the jump. Alright, so I just unboxed these Air Jordan Mid 1s in this classic "Black Toe" colorway. First impression? Solid! The build quality feels on point for the $120 price tag. That iconic silhouette is just… timeless. Pulling them out of the box, the leather isn't super premium, but it's decent for this tier. You're getting that legendary Jordan 1 look, but in a Mid cut, which is interesting for versatility.

  • Shown: Georgetown
  • Style: CT8527-115

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5